RAG Frameworks: Building Faster with LangChain and LlamaIndex

RAG Frameworks: Building Faster with LangChain and LlamaIndex

Stop building from scratch. Learn how to use professional AI frameworks to orchestrate complex RAG pipelines, manage memory, and connect to hundreds of data sources.

RAG Frameworks: Orchestrating the Complexity

So far in this course, we have written our own logic to connect to Chroma or Pinecone. While this is great for learning, building a production AI system from scratch is risky. You have to manually handle retries, prompt formatting, document parsing, and memory management.

This is where Orchestration Frameworks come in. LangChain and LlamaIndex are the two most powerful tools in the AI engineer's toolkit. They provide "Legos" for AI development, allowing you to build complex RAG pipelines in 10 lines of code.

In this lesson, we will compare LangChain and LlamaIndex and build a standardized RAG agent that can "Chat with a PDF."


1. LangChain vs. LlamaIndex: Which one to choose?

Both frameworks do the same thing: they connect LLMs to external data. However, they have different philosophies.

LangChain: The Swiss Army Knife

  • Focus: Building generic AI agents and "Chains."
  • Best For: Multi-step workflows (e.g., "Search the web, summarize it, and then write an email").
  • Ecosystem: Massive support for 500+ integrations.

LlamaIndex: The Specialized Data Librarian

  • Focus: Specifically designed for RAG and data retrieval.
  • Best For: "Connect to my data and tell me what it says."
  • Performance: Generally better at indexing complex data structures (like SQL + PDFs).

2. The Components of a Framework Pipeline

Frameworks standardize the RAG pipeline we learned in Lesson 2 into 5 parts:

  1. Loaders: Connect to PDFs, S3, Slack, or GitHub.
  2. Splitters: Automatically chunk the data.
  3. VectorStore: Wrappers for Pinecone, Chroma, and OpenSearch.
  4. Retriever: The logic that queries the VectorStore.
  5. Chain/Agent: The loop that combines retrieval and LLM calls.
graph LR
    L[Loaders] --> S[Splitters]
    S --> VS[VectorStore]
    VS --> R[Retriever]
    R --> C[Chain / Agent]
    C --> A[Final Answer]

3. Python Example: The LangChain RAG Pattern

Let's see how much cleaner the code becomes using LangChain's abstractions.

from langchain_community.document_loaders import PyPDFLoader
from langchain_text_splitters import RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter
from langchain_chroma import Chroma
from langchain_openai import OpenAIEmbeddings, ChatOpenAI
from langchain.chains import RetrievalQA

# 1. Load and Split
loader = PyPDFLoader("company_manual.pdf")
docs = loader.load()
text_splitter = RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter(chunk_size=1000, chunk_overlap=100)
splits = text_splitter.split_documents(docs)

# 2. Embed and Store
vectorstore = Chroma.from_documents(
    documents=splits, 
    embedding=OpenAIEmbeddings()
)

# 3. Create the RAG Chain
rag_chain = RetrievalQA.from_chain_type(
    llm=ChatOpenAI(model_name="gpt-4"),
    chain_type="stuff", # 'Stuffing' all context into one prompt
    retriever=vectorstore.as_retriever()
)

# 4. Use it!
response = rag_chain.invoke("What is the dress code?")
print(response['result'])

4. The Power of "Agents"

The biggest advantage of these frameworks is the Agentic capability. Instead of a linear search, an agent can decide how to use the vector database.

Example: A user asks "What was the revenue in 2023 vs 2022?"

  • A standard RAG pipeline might find one doc and fail.
  • A LangChain Agent will say: "I need to perform two searches. First, I'll search for 2022 revenue. Then, I'll search for 2023 revenue. Finally, I'll compare them."

5. Memory: Managing the Conversation

Vector databases are great for "Long-term Memory," but what about the conversation the user is currently having?

Frameworks handle Chat History (Short-term context) automatically.

  • You provide the session_id.
  • The framework retrieves previous messages from a fast cache (like Redis).
  • It generates a "Standalone Question" that incorporates the chat history before searching the vector database.

6. Avoiding "Framework Bloat"

As you become a senior engineer, you must decide when a framework is too much.

  • If you are just building a simple chatbot: Using 4 massive libraries might make your app slow and hard to debug.
  • If you are building an enterprise system: The safety and testing tools of LlamaIndex are worth the complexity.

Summary and Key Takeaways

Frameworks are established paths for AI engineering.

  1. LangChain and LlamaIndex automate the boilerplate of RAG.
  2. Loaders and Splitters handle the mess of PDF and Web data.
  3. Retrievers provide a standardized interface for search.
  4. Agents allow the LLM to use the vector database as a tool, not just a static source.

In the next lesson, we wrap up Module 10 with a Final Project, where you will build a complete Document Q&A Bot that can handle multiple file formats and provide accurate citations.


Exercise: Framework Comparison

  1. Look at the code in Lesson 2 (Bare Python) vs. Lesson 4 (LangChain).
    • Which one is easier to read?
    • Which one is easier to test?
  2. If you want to connect your AI to a Discord channel, which framework integration would you look for first?
  3. Designing his RAG system, why would you use LlamaIndex if your data lives in a "Knowledge Graph" (connected nodes) rather than just flat documents?

Congratulations on completing Module 10 Lesson 4! You're ready to build like a pro.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest posts delivered right to your inbox.

Subscribe on LinkedIn