Designing the Research Graph

Designing the Research Graph

Map out the brains of your assistant. Learn how to architect a multi-agent graph with planning nodes, retrieval nodes, and quality-control loops using LangGraph.

Designing the Research Graph

A professional AI application is not a single script; it's a Conversation between Nodes. In this lesson, we will design the architecture for your Research Assistant using the LangGraph philosophy.

By the end of this lesson, you will have a visual map of how your agent "thinks" and "works."


1. The Multi-Agent Blueprint

For our Capstone, we will use a Three-Node System:

  1. The Planner: Receives the user question and breaks it into 3 "Sub-Questions."
  2. The Researcher: Takes each sub-question and decides whether to use the Local Vector DB or Web Search.
  3. The Editor: Collects all findings, removes duplicates, and generates the final report.
graph TD
    A[User Input] --> B[Planner Node]
    B -- Sub-Questions --> C[Researcher Node]
    C -- "Use Tool" --> D[Tool: Vector DB]
    C -- "Use Tool" --> E[Tool: Web Search]
    D & E --> F[Researcher: Analyze Observations]
    F -- "Is research complete?" --> G{Decision}
    G -- No --> C
    G -- Yes --> H[Editor Node]
    H --> I[Final Markdownized Report]

2. Defining the State Object

Because our agent is "Stateful," we need a shared dictionary that all nodes can access.

class ResearchState(TypedDict):
    topic: str
    sub_questions: List[str]
    raw_findings: List[str]
    final_report: str
    iteration_count: int
  • Every time the Researcher finds a fact, it appends it to raw_findings.
  • The Editor reads the entire raw_findings list to write the report.

3. The "Conditional Edge" (The Self-Healer)

One of the most powerful features of your architecture is the Conditional Edge.

  • After the Researcher finishes, we don't just move to the Editor.
  • We move to a Quality Gate node. This node uses a cheap LLM to verify: "Is there enough information to answer the user's question?"
  • If the answer is No, it sends the Researcher back out for more data!

4. Engineering the RAG Pipeline

For the Vector DB part of your architecture:

  1. Model: Use text-embedding-3-small for the vectors.
  2. DB: Use ChromaDB.
  3. Chunking: Use RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter with a 1,000-character size and 150-character overlap.

Summary of the Design

  • Modularity: Each agent has one specific job.
  • Verification: The system can loop back if it fails its own quality check.
  • Structured Data: The system builds up a "Knowledge Base" in the ResearchState before writing a single word of the report.

In the next lesson, we will turn this architectural diagram into Functional Python Code.


Exercise: Identify the Bottleneck

Look at the diagram again.

  1. Which node is the most "Expensive" in terms of tokens?
  2. Which node is the most likely to "Hallucinate"?
  3. How would you add a "Human-in-the-Loop" step to this diagram?

Answer Logic:

  1. The Editor. It has to process the entire history of research to write the report.
  2. The Researcher. It receives raw, messy data from the web and might misinterpret it.
  3. HITL: You would place an "Interrupt" between the Planner and the Researcher. The human reviews the "Sub-Questions" and approves them before the bot spends money on search tokens!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest posts delivered right to your inbox.

Subscribe on LinkedIn