Module 7 Lesson 1: Why RAG Matters
Fighting Hallucinations. Understanding the architectural pattern of grounding AI responses in factual, retrieved context.
Why RAG Matters: The "Reference Book" Strategy
If you ask a standard GPT model about your private company's budget, it will lie. It hasn't been trained on your data. RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) is the technique of giving the model the data during the prompt.
1. The RAG Workflow
- Retrieve: Find relevant facts in your Vector Store (Module 6).
- Augment: Insert those facts into a Prompt Template (Module 3).
- Generate: Ask the LLM to answer the question only using those facts.
2. RAG vs. Fine-Tuning
- Fine-Tuning: Like a doctor going to medical school for 10 years (Slow, expensive, fixed knowledge).
- RAG: Like a doctor doing a surgery with an open textbook (Fast, cheap, always up to date).
3. Visualizing the RAG Loop
graph TD
User[Query: 'What is my PTO?'] --> V[Vector Store]
V -->|Search| C[Context: 'You have 15 days']
C --> P[Prompt: 'Answer using this Context: {C} User: {User}']
P --> LLM[Chat Model]
LLM --> Result['You have 15 days of PTO.']
4. The "Grounding" Instruction
The most important part of a RAG prompt is the Constraint: "You are an expert assistant. Answer the user's question using the provided context. If the answer is not in the context, say 'I do not know'. Do not use your own internal knowledge."
This instruction is what turns a creative LLM into a reliable Truth Machine.
5. Engineering Tip: Citation Support
Because you have the metadata from Module 5, your RAG system should always include source links.
- Output: "Our vacation policy is 15 days (Source: HR_Handbook.pdf, Page 12)."
Key Takeaways
- RAG grounds AI responses in external, verifiable facts.
- It is cheaper and more flexible than fine-tuning.
- The "Grounding Instruction" prevents the AI from being creative with facts.
- Citations build user trust by showing the "Source of Truth."