Project 2: Multi-tenant SaaS Platform on Kubernetes

Project 2: Multi-tenant SaaS Platform on Kubernetes

Master the 'Noisy Neighbor' problem. Learn to build a secure, multi-tenant platform where multiple customers share the same cluster without ever seeing each other's data.

Project 2: The Multi-tenant SaaS Fortress

Imagine you are building a "Chatbot-as-a-Service" company. You have 1,000 different customers. Some are small startups with 10 users; some are massive enterprises with 100,000 users.

You don't want to create 1,000 separate Kubernetes clusters—that would be a management nightmare and incredibly expensive. Instead, you want to host them all on a single, massive cluster. But you have several "Nightmare Scenarios" to prevent:

  1. Data Leakage: Customer A manages to "See" Customer B's secrets or database.
  2. Noisy Neighbors: Customer A runs a massive AI job that consumes 100% of the cluster's GPUs, causing Customer B's bot to go offline.
  3. Security Escalation: A bug in Customer A's code allows them to gain "Cluster-Admin" and take over your entire platform.

In this project, we will build a Multi-tenant SaaS Platform that solves all three problems. We will use Namespaces, Resource Quotas, Network Policies, and Hierarchical Namespaces (HNC) to create a platform that is secure, fair, and scalable.


1. The Multi-tenant Strategy: Namespace-as-a-Container

In our platform, every "Customer" gets exactly one Namespace.

apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
  name: customer-apple
  labels:
    tenant: apple
    tier: enterprise

2. Preventing "Noisy Neighbors": Resource Quotas

We cannot allow one customer to starve others. We must enforce a "Hard Limit" on every namespace.

apiVersion: v1
kind: ResourceQuota
metadata:
  name: compute-quota
  namespace: customer-apple
spec:
  hard:
    requests.cpu: "4"
    requests.memory: "16Gi"
    limits.cpu: "8"
    limits.memory: "32Gi"
    pods: "20"
    services.loadbalancers: "1"

If Customer Apple tries to create a 21st pod, Kubernetes will reject it. This ensures your cluster always has spare capacity for your other 999 customers.


3. Sandboxing the Network: The "Air Gap"

By default, any pod in your cluster can talk to any other pod. This is a disaster for a SaaS. We must apply a "Default Deny" policy to every tenant.

apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
  name: tenant-isolation
  namespace: customer-apple
spec:
  podSelector: {} # Select all pods in this namespace
  policyTypes:
  - Ingress
  ingress:
  - from:
    - podSelector: {} # Only allow pods within THIS SAME namespace

4. Visualizing the Tenant Isolation

graph TD
    subgraph "The Global Cluster"
        subgraph "Namespace: Customer-Apple"
            AppA["Apple Frontend"] -- "Allowed" --> DBA["Apple DB"]
        end
        
        subgraph "Namespace: Customer-Google"
            AppG["Google Frontend"] -- "Allowed" --> DBG["Google DB"]
        end
        
        AppA -- "REJECTED (NetworkPolicy)" --> DBG
        AppG -- "REJECTED (NetworkPolicy)" --> DBA
    end
    
    Quotas["Resource Quotas"] -- "Enforce" --> AppA
    Quotas -- "Enforce" --> AppG
    
    style AppA fill:#9f9,stroke:#333
    style AppG fill:#9f9,stroke:#333
    style DBA fill:#f96,stroke:#333
    style DBG fill:#f96,stroke:#333

5. Handling "Sub-Teams": Hierarchical Namespaces (HNC)

Large customers might need separate sub-namespaces (e.g., apple-dev, apple-prod). Managing quotas for 5 different Apple namespaces is a pain.

We use Hierarchical Namespaces.

  • You create a "Parent" namespace: customer-apple.
  • You put the 100GB GPU quota on the Parent.
  • The children (apple-dev, apple-prod) automatically "Share" that 100GB quota. If Dev uses 90GB, Prod only has 10GB left. This is true multi-tenant governance.

6. Self-Service: The Tenant Portal

A professional SaaS shouldn't require an engineer to manually run kubectl create ns.

The Automated Workflow:

  1. User signs up on your Next.js website.
  2. Your FastAPI backend receives the request.
  3. The Backend uses the Kubernetes Python Client to:
    • Create the Namespace.
    • Apply the ResourceQuota.
    • Apply the NetworkPolicy.
    • Create a ServiceAccount and return the token to the user so they can manage their own pods.

7. AI Implementation: Multi-tenant GPU Slicing

GPUs are the most expensive part of your SaaS. You don't want to give one customer a whole H100 if they only need a tiny bit of processing.

The Fractional GPU Strategy:

  1. NVIDIA Time-Slicing: Configure your worker nodes to allow "Slicing."
  2. Quotas: Instead of a whole GPU, give a tenant nvidia.com/gpu: 0.1 (10% of a GPU).
  3. Result: You can host 10 different AI startups on a single physical GPU node, drastically increasing your profit margins.

8. Project Summary and Key Takeaways

  • Namespace Isolation: The fundamental unit of multi-tenancy.
  • ResourceQuota: The absolute "Hard Limit" that prevents resource starvation.
  • NetworkPolicy: Creating virtual "Air Gaps" between customer data.
  • RBAC: Ensuring a customer can only see their own namespace.
  • Automation: Use the K8s API to turn cluster management into a software service.

In the final project of this module, we will tackle the most "High-Stakes" part of any cluster: The High-Availability Database.


9. SEO Metadata & Keywords

Focus Keywords: building multi-tenant SaaS on Kubernetes, K8s resource quota vs limit range, isolating tenants with network policy, hierarchical namespaces K8s tutorial HNC, GPU time-slicing for AI SaaS, Kubernetes multi-tenancy best practices.

Meta Description: Scale your startup like a pro. Learn how to build a secure, multi-tenant SaaS platform on Kubernetes, using advanced isolation, quotas, and automation to host thousands of customers on a single, cost-effective cluster.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest posts delivered right to your inbox.

Subscribe on LinkedIn