When Fine-Tuning is Needed: To Train or Prompt?

When Fine-Tuning is Needed: To Train or Prompt?

Fine-tuning is expensive and slow. Prompting is cheap and fast. Learn the decision framework for when to actually finetune a Gemini model.

When Fine-Tuning is Needed

"Should I fine-tune?" is the most common question in AI engineering. The answer is usually "No, fix your prompt first."

What is Fine-Tuning?

Fine-tuning takes a base model (like Gemini 1.5 Flash) and continues training it on your specific data. It updates the internal weights of the neural network.

The Hierarchy of Optimization

  1. Prompt Engineering: Cheapest. Fastest.
  2. Few-Shot Prompting: Adding examples to the prompt.
  3. RAG (Retrieval): Injecting knowledge into the context.
  4. Fine-Tuning: Retraining the model.

When to Fine-Tune?

You fine-tune for Form, not Fact.

  • Structure/Tone: If you need the model to sound exactly like your company's brand voice (sarcastic, terse, pirate-themed), prompting is hard. Tuning captures "Vibes" perfectly.
  • Specialized Format: If you need valid COBOL code or a proprietary JSON schema that the model keeps messing up even with examples.
  • Latency/Cost: A fine-tuned smaller model (Flash) can sometimes outperform a prompted larger model (Pro). You tune Flash to replace Pro and save money.

When NOT to Fine-Tune?

  • New Knowledge: Do not fine-tune to teach the model "Who won the Super Bowl last week." It is inefficient. Use RAG for facts.
  • Reasoning: Tuning rarely improves raw logic capabilities.

Summary

  • Try prompting.
  • Try RAG.
  • If you still need specific style consistency or lower latency: Fine-Tune.

In the next lesson, we discuss Dataset Preparation.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest posts delivered right to your inbox.

Subscribe on LinkedIn