
When Fine-Tuning is Needed: To Train or Prompt?
Fine-tuning is expensive and slow. Prompting is cheap and fast. Learn the decision framework for when to actually finetune a Gemini model.
When Fine-Tuning is Needed
"Should I fine-tune?" is the most common question in AI engineering. The answer is usually "No, fix your prompt first."
What is Fine-Tuning?
Fine-tuning takes a base model (like Gemini 1.5 Flash) and continues training it on your specific data. It updates the internal weights of the neural network.
The Hierarchy of Optimization
- Prompt Engineering: Cheapest. Fastest.
- Few-Shot Prompting: Adding examples to the prompt.
- RAG (Retrieval): Injecting knowledge into the context.
- Fine-Tuning: Retraining the model.
When to Fine-Tune?
You fine-tune for Form, not Fact.
- Structure/Tone: If you need the model to sound exactly like your company's brand voice (sarcastic, terse, pirate-themed), prompting is hard. Tuning captures "Vibes" perfectly.
- Specialized Format: If you need valid COBOL code or a proprietary JSON schema that the model keeps messing up even with examples.
- Latency/Cost: A fine-tuned smaller model (Flash) can sometimes outperform a prompted larger model (Pro). You tune Flash to replace Pro and save money.
When NOT to Fine-Tune?
- New Knowledge: Do not fine-tune to teach the model "Who won the Super Bowl last week." It is inefficient. Use RAG for facts.
- Reasoning: Tuning rarely improves raw logic capabilities.
Summary
- Try prompting.
- Try RAG.
- If you still need specific style consistency or lower latency: Fine-Tune.
In the next lesson, we discuss Dataset Preparation.