The Performance Scale: Latency vs. Accuracy

The Performance Scale: Latency vs. Accuracy

Faster or Smarter? Learn how to balance the speed of your AI response with the quality of the intelligence.

The Speed of Sentiment

In the previous lesson, we looked at Cost. Now, we look at Performance. In AI, "Performance" is usually a trade-off between two contradicting goals:

  1. Latency: How fast does the user get the answer?
  2. Accuracy/Quality: How "Right" is the answer?

On the AWS Certified AI Practitioner exam, you will be given a specific business requirement and asked to choose a model that fits the "Performance Profile."


1. High Latency, High Accuracy (The Specialist)

The Scenario: A lawyer needs to find a tiny error in a 500-page contract.

  • The Priorities: Accuracy is the only thing that matters. If the AI is wrong, the lawyer might lose millions. They don't mind waiting 30 seconds for the answer.
  • The Choice: Use a Large Foundation Model (e.g., Claude 3 Opus or Llama 405B).

2. Low Latency, Low-to-Medium Accuracy (The Speedster)

The Scenario: A customer is typing into a live chat and expects an "Instant" auto-complete or a quick "Hello."

  • The Priorities: Speed is the priority. If the AI takes 10 seconds to say "Hello," the customer will leave. Small errors in grammar are acceptable if the response is fast.
  • The Choice: Use a Small Language Model (SLM) (e.g., Claude 3 Haiku or Mistral 7B).

3. The "Cold Start" Problem

If you are using AWS Lambda or SageMaker Serverless Inference, you might experience a "Cold Start."

  • This is the delay while AWS "Wakes up" your server after it hasn't been used for a while.
  • For a website that needs a response in under 500ms, a "Cold Start" of 5 seconds is unacceptable. In this case, you must use Provisioned Throughput or Real-time Endpoints (Always On).

4. Visualizing the Performance Curve

graph LR
    subgraph Speed_Domain
    A[Claude Haiku]
    B[Mistral 7B]
    end
    
    subgraph Logic_Domain
    C[Claude Sonnet]
    D[Llama 70B]
    end
    
    subgraph Brain_Domain
    E[Claude Opus]
    F[Lama 405B]
    end
    
    A & B -->|LOW Latency / LOW Cost| G[UI Interaction]
    C & D -->|MED Latency / MED Cost| H[General Assistance]
    E & F -->|HIGH Latency / HIGH Cost| I[Scientific / Legal Analysis]
    
    Note[As Complexity increases, Latentcy increases]

5. Summary: Know Your User

Before choosing a model:

  • Ask: "Is this for a machine (Batch) or a human (Real-time)?"
  • Ask: "What is the cost of a mistake?"
  • Ask: "What is the cost of a delay?"

Exercise: Identify the Performance Need

A gaming company is using AI to generate "NPC Dialogue" (speech for non-player characters) while the player is walking through a forest. If the AI takes longer than 200ms to generate the speech, the game will stutter. Which model should they choose?

  • A. Anthropic Claude 3 Opus (High Accuracy/High Latency).
  • B. Anthropic Claude 3 Haiku (Medium Accuracy/Low Latency).
  • C. A custom-trained 500B parameter model in SageMaker.
  • D. Amazon Transcribe.

The Answer is B! Haiku is designed specifically for High-speed, low-latency tasks where real-time interaction is critical.


Knowledge Check

?Knowledge Check

What typically happens to the 'Inference Latency' as you increase the size and complexity of the foundation model you are using?

What's Next?

Performance is one thing, but what about "Risks"? We’ve talked about hackers, but what about "Infrastructure"? Find out in Lesson 3: Infrastructure Risk Awareness.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest posts delivered right to your inbox.

Subscribe on LinkedIn